Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 20, 2022

Baldia v. RN Express Staffing Registry LLC

Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Docket
1:19-cv-11268
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
FlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Baldia v. RN Express, Judge Gorenstein approved the parties’ Fair Labor Standards Act settlement and dismissed the case with prejudice.

Who this affects

Marie Alexandrine Baldia, RN Express Staffing Registry LLC, and the other defendants named in the action.

What happened

Marie Alexandrine Baldia brought Fair Labor Standards Act claims against RN Express Staffing Registry LLC and other defendants in Baldia v. RN Express Staffing Registry LLC.

The parties submitted a proposed settlement agreement. After reviewing it, the court found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it.

Judge Gorenstein dismissed the action with prejudice and without costs, except as provided in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement, found any pending motions moot, and directed the Clerk to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Baldia v. RN Express Staffing Registry LLC · No. 1:19-cv-11268
Judge
Gabriel Gorenstein
Date
Dec. 20, 2022

Background

The case included claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. The parties consented to have the matter decided by United States Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein under 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Settlement Review

The parties submitted a proposed settlement agreement in filings dated December 16, 2022. The court reviewed the proposed agreement under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., as required for review of certain Fair Labor Standards Act settlements. The court found the settlement fair and reasonable and approved it.

Ruling

Judge Gorenstein ordered that the action be dismissed with prejudice and without costs, except as stated in the settlement agreement. The court retained jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, found any pending motions moot, and requested that the Clerk close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.