Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 27, 2022

Rundle v. Garnet Health Medical Center

Judge
Cathy Seibel
Docket
7:22-cv-09716
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
EmploymentCivil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Rundle v. Garnet Health Medical Center, Judge Seibel authorized U.S. Marshals service after Rundle was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees.

Who this affects

Linda Lee Rundle, who is representing herself, and the listed defendants, Garnet Health Medical Center and Garnet Health Doctors. The service directions specifically identify Garnet Health Medical Center.

What happened

In Rundle v. Garnet Health Medical Center, Linda Lee Rundle, representing herself, alleges that her employer discriminated against her because of her race and color under federal employment law.

Because Rundle was allowed to proceed without paying filing fees, the court said she could rely on the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court extended the service deadline until 90 days after the summons is issued.

Judge Cathy Seibel directed the Clerk of Court to issue a summons for Garnet Health Medical Center, complete the required service forms, and give the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. The order also directed the Clerk to mail Rundle an information package.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Rundle v. Garnet Health Medical Center · No. 7:22-cv-09716
Judge
Cathy Seibel
Date
Dec. 27, 2022

Background Linda Lee Rundle brings this self-represented action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging that her employer discriminated against her based on race and color. The court had previously granted her permission to proceed without paying filing fees.

Service of Process A plaintiff permitted to proceed without paying filing fees may rely on the court and the U.S. Marshals Service to serve the defendants. The court explained that Rundle could not have served the summons and complaint before the court reviewed the complaint and ordered that a summons be issued. It therefore extended the usual service period to 90 days after the summons is issued.

The Clerk of Court was instructed to issue a summons for Garnet Health Medical Center, complete the U.S. Marshals Service process forms with that defendant’s address, and deliver the necessary paperwork to the Marshals Service. The order states that, if service is not completed within 90 days after the summonses are issued, Rundle should request more time. It also requires her to notify the court in writing if her address changes and warns that the action may be dismissed if she fails to do so.

Ruling Judge Cathy Seibel ordered the Clerk to mail Rundle an information package and to arrange service of Garnet Health Medical Center through the U.S. Marshals Service. This order addresses service procedures and does not decide whether Rundle’s discrimination allegations are legally valid.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.