Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 23, 2022

Carter v. Jenkins

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:22-cv-10326
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Carter v. Jenkins, Judge Swain granted amendment leave, denied summons issuance without prejudice, and set a 60-day filing deadline.

Who this affects

Darryl C. Carter must file an amended complaint within 60 days if he wants to amend his pleading; no defendant is required to respond or be served at this stage.

What happened

Darryl C. Carter, who is representing himself, sued Gary Jenkins and other defendants under a federal civil-rights law. He alleges that the defendants denied him benefits and placed him in inadequate housing.

Carter asked to amend his complaint and asked the court to issue summonses for service by the U.S. Marshals Service. The court granted permission to amend but denied the summons request without prejudice, allowing him to renew it after filing the amended complaint.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain gave Carter 60 days to file an amended complaint. No summons will issue now; if Carter does not amend within that time, the original complaint will remain the operative pleading. The court also denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for any appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Carter v. Jenkins · No. 1:22-cv-10326
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Dec. 23, 2022

Background

Darryl C. Carter, appearing pro se, meaning without a lawyer, brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that Gary Jenkins and other defendants violated his rights by denying him benefits and placing him in inadequate housing. The court had previously granted Carter permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees.

Motions

Carter filed a motion to amend his complaint and a motion asking the court to issue summonses for service by the U.S. Marshals Service. The court granted the motion to amend. It denied the motion for issuance of summons without prejudice to renewal after Carter files his amended complaint.

Order and Effect

The court granted Carter leave to file an amended complaint. He must submit it to the court’s Pro Se Intake Unit within 60 days of the order, title it “Amended Complaint,” and include docket number 22-CV-10326 (LTS). No summons will issue at this time. If Carter does not file an amended complaint within 60 days, the original complaint will remain the operative pleading.

The court certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order does not decide whether Carter’s underlying allegations are legally valid.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.