Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Dec. 30, 2022

Zinnamon v. Monroe & Main, Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:22-cv-03115
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Zinnamon v. Monroe & Main, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without costs, allowing restoration within 60 days.

Who this affects

Warren Zinnamon, the people he sought to represent, and Monroe & Main, Inc.; the case was closed subject to the stated 60-day restoration conditions.

What happened

Zinnamon v. Monroe & Main, Inc. was a case brought by Warren Zinnamon on behalf of himself and others similarly situated against Monroe & Main, Inc. The court was told that the case had been settled.

The order did not describe the settlement’s terms or decide the parties’ underlying claims. It stated that the case was discontinued without costs to either party.

Judge Ronnie Abrams allowed either party to seek restoration of the case within 60 days. The clerk was directed to close the case, and the court explained that any request for it to retain authority to enforce the settlement had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within that period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Zinnamon v. Monroe & Main, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-03115
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
Dec. 30, 2022

Background

The opinion states that the court was informed that the case had been settled. Warren Zinnamon was the plaintiff, acting on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, and Monroe & Main, Inc. was the defendant. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms or describe the underlying claims.

Ruling

Judge Ronnie Abrams ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket if an application to restore was made within 60 days. The order states that an application to reopen filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late.

The court also stated that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—that is, authority—to enforce the settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 60-day period. The clerk was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.