D.C. v. New York City Department of Education
- Ronnie Abrams
- 1:22-cv-05010
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In D.C. v. New York City Department of Education, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled-in-principle case without costs, allowing restoration within 30 days.
D.C., C.F., C.C., and the New York City Department of Education were affected by the order discontinuing the action and closing the case. The parties had 30 days to seek restoration or to place settlement terms on the public record for possible court enforcement.
What happened
D.C. and C.F., each individually and on behalf of C.C., sued the New York City Department of Education. The court was told that the case had been settled in principle.
The court discontinued the action without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it to the court’s docket within 30 days. The court directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.
Judge Ronnie Abrams also stated that any request to reopen filed after 30 days may be denied solely because it was late. If the parties wanted the court to keep authority to enforce their settlement, they had to place the settlement terms on the public record and obtain the court’s approval within that same 30-day period.
The detailed version
- D.C. v. New York City Department of Education · No. 1:22-cv-05010
- Ronnie Abrams
- Jan. 10, 2023
Background
The opinion states that D.C. and C.F., individually and on behalf of C.C., brought this action against the New York City Department of Education. The court was informed that the case had been settled in principle. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.
Court’s Action
The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. The court stated that any application to reopen filed after that period may be denied solely on that basis. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.
Settlement Enforcement
The court stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain jurisdiction—that is, authority—to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. The order did not decide the underlying claims or the merits of the dispute.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.