Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 19, 2023

Cerrato Galan v. Style Management Co., Inc.

Judge
Barbara Moses
Docket
1:22-cv-01137
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureFlsa
In one sentence

In Cerrato Galan v. Style Management, Judge Broderick granted a one-week extension to seek approval of an FLSA settlement.

Who this affects

The extension affected Ronald Cerrato Galan and the defendants by moving the deadline for serving the motion to approve their FLSA settlement from January 20 to January 27, 2023.

What happened

Ronald Cerrato Galan’s lawyer told the court that the parties had reached a settlement in principle concerning claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. The court had directed the plaintiff to submit a motion seeking approval of the Fair Labor Standards Act settlement by January 20, 2023.

The plaintiff asked, with the defendants’ consent, for one additional week to serve that motion. The request explained that defense counsel was unavailable because of a family emergency and that the parties still needed to confer about the joint approval motion. The plaintiff had already received two extensions.

The court granted the application, extending the deadline from January 20 to January 27, 2023. The order was signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cerrato Galan v. Style Management Co., Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-01137
Judge
Barbara Moses
Date
Jan. 19, 2023

Background

Ronald Cerrato Galan, through counsel, sued Style Management Co., Inc., and other defendants for alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and New York Labor Law. The opinion text identifies the defendants in the application as I Rosenberg Auto Repairs Inc., Andrew Rosenberg, and Stefanie Rosenberg. The parties had reached a settlement in principle, and the court had directed the plaintiff to submit a motion seeking approval of the FLSA settlement by January 20, 2023.

Requested extension

The plaintiff requested, with the defendants’ consent, a one-week extension of the deadline, from January 20 to January 27, 2023. The application stated that the parties had completed negotiations about the formal settlement agreement but still needed to confer about their joint motion for approval. It also stated that defense counsel was unavailable because of a family emergency. The plaintiff had previously sought two extensions, which had been granted.

Ruling

The court granted the application. The order therefore extended the deadline for the plaintiff to serve the motion seeking approval of the FLSA settlement to January 27, 2023. The order bears the notation “SO ORDERED” and was signed by Vernon S. Broderick.

Note on the supplied metadata

The supplied case information identifies Barbara Moses as the judge, but the opinion text shows the application addressed to and ordered by Vernon S. Broderick. This summary follows the judge’s name shown in the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.