Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Jan. 25, 2023

Cruz v. Local 32BJ

Judge
Paul Gardephe
Docket
1:22-cv-03068
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureMotion to Dismiss
In one sentence

In Cruz v. Local 32BJ, Judge Gardephe denied defendants’ motions to dismiss as moot after Cruz filed an amended complaint.

Who this affects

Local 32BJ and Harvard Maintenance, Inc., whose motions to dismiss the original complaint were denied as moot; the Clerk of Court was directed to terminate those motions.

What happened

In Cruz v. Local 32BJ, Carina Cruz filed an amended complaint while defendants’ motions to dismiss the original complaint were pending.

Because the amended complaint had been filed, the court denied the defendants’ motions to dismiss as moot. The court also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate those motions.

Judge Paul G. Gardephe issued the order on January 25, 2023. The order did not decide the merits of Cruz’s claims or the defendants’ arguments.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Cruz v. Local 32BJ · No. 1:22-cv-03068
Judge
Paul Gardephe
Date
Jan. 25, 2023

Background

Carina Cruz filed an amended complaint at Docket Number 46. Before that filing, Local 32BJ and Harvard Maintenance, Inc. had filed motions to dismiss the original complaint at Docket Numbers 23 and 28.

Ruling

Because Cruz filed an amended complaint, the court denied the defendants’ motions to dismiss the original complaint as moot. A motion is moot when a later event means the court no longer needs to decide it. The court directed the Clerk of Court to terminate the motions at Docket Numbers 23 and 28.

Effect of the Order

The order addressed only the pending motions to dismiss the original complaint. It did not decide the merits of Cruz’s claims or the defendants’ arguments, and it did not state whether the amended complaint would be dismissed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.