Severino v. Avondale Care Group, LLC
- Stewart Aaron
- 1:21-cv-10720
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 6
In Severino v. Avondale Care Group, Judge Aaron approved a class settlement, awarded fees and expenses, approved service awards, and dismissed the action with prejudice.
The settlement class—Avondale employees who worked 24-hour live-in shifts from December 15, 2015, through September 15, 2023, as identified in the settlement materials—was affected by the approved settlement and release. Class counsel received $1,666,667 in fees and $30,495.21 in expenses; each named plaintiff received a $15,000 service award; and the claims administrator received $16,606.07.
What happened
In Severino v. Avondale Care Group, LLC, employees who worked 24-hour live-in shifts sued Avondale and reached a settlement. The proposed class covered Avondale employees listed in the settlement materials who worked those shifts from December 15, 2015, through September 15, 2023, excluding certain people with other litigation or arbitration against Avondale.
The court found that notice was adequate, no class members were excluded, and no one objected at the fairness hearing. It found the settlement fair, reasonable, and adequate under the class-action rules and found that the Fair Labor Standards Act claims were fairly and reasonably resolved. The court approved the settlement, its payment plan, and the release of covered claims.
Judge Stewart D. Aaron granted the motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses, awarding class counsel $1,666,667 in fees and $30,495.21 in expenses. The court also approved $15,000 service awards for each named plaintiff and $16,606.07 for the claims administrator, dismissed the action with prejudice, and retained limited authority to enforce and administer the settlement.
The detailed version
- Severino v. Avondale Care Group, LLC · No. 1:21-cv-10720
- Stewart Aaron
- Jan. 31, 2024
Background
Named Plaintiffs Keila Severino, Khady Gueye, and Delsa Jimenez brought this action individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons against Avondale Care Group, LLC. In September 2023, the parties entered into a Settlement Agreement. The court had previously granted preliminary approval, provisionally certified a settlement class, appointed class counsel and a settlement administrator, and authorized notice to class members.
The settlement class consisted of Avondale employees who worked a 24-hour live-in shift from December 15, 2015, through September 15, 2023, as reflected in the settlement materials. The class excluded certain former employees who had settled litigation or arbitration against Avondale or had pending individual litigation against Avondale.
Class Certification and Settlement Approval
For settlement purposes only, the court found that the requirements for class certification under Rule 23(a) were met. It certified the action as a class action, certified the named plaintiffs as class representatives, and certified Getman, Sweeney & Dunn PLLC and Bohrer Brady, LLC as class counsel.
The court found that the class notice adequately explained the settlement terms, estimated recoveries, procedures for obtaining payment, the right to request exclusion, the opportunity to object, and the opportunity to appear at the fairness hearing. The court found that the parties complied with the notice requirements of the Class Action Fairness Act. No objections were lodged, and the court found that there were no exclusions from the settlement class.
The court found that the Settlement Agreement was fair, reasonable, and adequate under Rule 23(e)(2). It also found that resolving the claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act represented a fair and reasonable resolution of a genuine dispute. The court approved the settlement’s allocation procedures and the release of the claims defined in the agreement, finding the releases fair, reasonable, and enforceable under the Fair Labor Standards Act and Rule 23.
Fees, Awards, Judgment, and Disposition
The court granted Plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees and reimbursement of expenses. It awarded class counsel $1,666,667 in attorneys’ fees and $30,495.21 in litigation expenses. The court also approved service awards of $15,000 for each named plaintiff and approved $16,606.07 in costs for the claims administrator.
The court granted final approval of the Settlement Agreement and directed the parties and claims administrator to follow its terms. The entry of the order and judgment fully, finally, and forever released the claims covered by the agreement as to all class members. The court dismissed the action in its entirety with prejudice, without costs to the parties except as provided in the settlement agreement. It retained jurisdiction solely to enforce the settlement, address settlement-administration disputes, and handle appropriate post-judgment matters. The Clerk was requested to enter judgment and close the case.
Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.