Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 3, 2023

NMB Therapeutics, Inc. v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:22-cv-05057
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In NMB Therapeutics v. National Fire, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice, without costs, and closed it.

Who this affects

NMB Therapeutics, Inc. and National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford.

What happened

NMB Therapeutics, Inc. v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford was resolved after the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle settling all issues.

The court canceled scheduled conferences and deadlines, terminated open motions, and dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees.

Judge Valerie Caproni closed the case but allowed the parties 30 days to seek reopening for good cause or to ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
NMB Therapeutics, Inc. v. National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford · No. 1:22-cv-05057
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Feb. 3, 2023

Background

The court stated that, on February 2, 2023, it was notified through the magistrate judge that NMB Therapeutics, Inc. and National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or the settlement terms.

Court’s action

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.

Reopening and settlement enforcement

The parties may apply to reopen the case within 30 days of the order. Such an application must show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement. A request filed after 30 days or without a showing of good cause may be denied on that basis alone. If the parties want the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement agreement, they must, within the same 30-day period, submit the agreement under Rule 7.A of the court’s Individual Practices and request an order expressly retaining that authority.

Disposition

Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, terminated the open motions, and directed that the case be closed.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.