Guerrero v. 100% Made in the USA Bully Tools, Inc.
- Valerie Caproni
- 1:22-cv-02466
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Guerrero v. 100% Made in the USA Bully Tools, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice and without costs.
Edelmira Guerrero and 100% Made in the USA Bully Tools, Inc. are bound by the dismissal and any settlement between them. Absent putative class members are not bound.
What happened
In Guerrero v. 100% Made in the USA Bully Tools, the parties told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The case was brought by Edel mira Guerrero individually and on behalf of similarly situated people.
The court canceled scheduled conferences and deadlines, dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, terminated open motions, and closed the case. The parties could ask to reopen the case within 30 days by showing good cause. They could also ask the court to retain authority to enforce their settlement by filing the settlement agreement and a request within that period.
Judge Valerie Caproni ordered the caption changed to remove the language about similarly situated people. Because the parties had not told the court they intended to follow the class-settlement procedure, the dismissal and any settlement apply only between Guerrero and the defendant and do not bind absent potential class members.
The detailed version
- Guerrero v. 100% Made in the USA Bully Tools, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-02466
- Valerie Caproni
- Feb. 6, 2023
Background
The plaintiff, Edel mira Guerrero, sued 100% Made in the USA Bully Tools, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. The opinion states that, on February 3, 2023, the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues.
Court’s action
The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. The Clerk of Court was directed to terminate all open motions and close the case.
The order allowed the parties to apply to reopen the case within 30 days. Such an application had to show good cause for keeping the case open despite the settlement. The order also stated that, if the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—the court’s authority—to enforce their settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and request continued jurisdiction within the same 30-day period.
Class allegations
The court directed the Clerk to remove from the caption the language stating that Guerrero sued individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. Because the parties had not notified the court that they intended to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), which governs certain class settlements and dismissals, the court stated that the dismissal and any settlement operate only between Guerrero and the defendant. They do not bind absent putative class members.
Disposition
Judge Valerie Caproni dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, terminated the open motions, closed the case, and limited the effect of the dismissal and settlement to Guerrero and the defendant.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.