Sander v. JP Morgan Chase
- Vincent Briccetti
- 7:22-cv-01543
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Sander v. JPMorgan Chase, Judge Briccetti granted the motion to dismiss, denied fee-free appeal status, and closed the case.
Marie Sander’s case was closed after the court granted the motion to dismiss. The judgment also denied her permission to appeal without paying court fees.
What happened
Marie Sander sued JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Jamie Dimon, McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce LLC, and Kyle Jacobs, Esq. The judgment does not describe the claims or the parties’ arguments.
The court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss. The judgment states that the reasons were given in a separate opinion and order dated February 9, 2023, which is not included here.
Judge Vincent Briccetti’s court also determined that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied Marie Sander permission to proceed without paying court fees for an appeal. The case was closed.
The detailed version
- Sander v. JP Morgan Chase · No. 7:22-cv-01543
- Vincent Briccetti
- Feb. 10, 2023
Disposition
The judgment states that, for the reasons given in the court’s opinion and order dated February 9, 2023, the motion to dismiss was granted. The judgment itself does not explain the claims, the grounds for dismissal, or the parties’ arguments.
The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to appeal without paying the required court fees. The case was closed.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.