Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 14, 2023

Farsura v. QC Terme US Corp

Judge
Loretta Preska
Docket
1:21-cv-09030
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureTax
In one sentence

In Farsura v. QC Terme US Corp., Judge Lehrburger granted QC Terme US’s request to seal four exhibits containing tax returns.

Who this affects

QC Terme US, the plaintiffs, and members of the public seeking access to Exhibits I, J, K, and L. Those exhibits were ordered sealed.

What happened

In Farsura v. QC Terme US Corp., QC Terme US asked the court to keep Exhibits I, J, K, and L to a supporting declaration under seal. The exhibits contained tax returns for QC Terme US Holding LLC for 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2020. The plaintiffs did not oppose the request.

QC Terme US argued that federal law protects tax returns and related information as confidential. It also noted that the documents had been designated confidential under the parties’ protective order and that the court had previously sealed tax-related materials in the same case.

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger granted the request and ordered Exhibits I, J, K, and L sealed. The order limits public access to those exhibits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Farsura v. QC Terme US Corp · No. 1:21-cv-09030
Judge
Loretta Preska
Date
Feb. 14, 2023

Background

The plaintiffs filed a reply supporting their motion for leave to amend the complaint. They also filed a supporting declaration, identified as ECF No. 264, with exhibits under seal. QC Terme US requested an order sealing Exhibits I, J, K, and L to that declaration. The plaintiffs did not oppose keeping the exhibits sealed.

The Request to Seal

QC Terme US stated that the exhibits contain tax returns for QC Terme US Holding LLC for 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2020. It relied on 26 U.S.C. § 6103(a), which provides that tax returns and return information are confidential. QC Terme US also stated that it had designated the documents as confidential when producing them and that the plaintiffs had not challenged those designations under the protective order.

The request also cited the rules governing public access to court records. Those rules require the court to weigh the public’s access rights against competing interests when the records qualify as judicial documents. QC Terme US argued that the confidentiality protections for tax information justified sealing even if the exhibits were judicial documents. It also pointed to an earlier order in the same case sealing materials related to tax returns.

Ruling

Judge Robert W. Lehrburger granted the request. The court ordered Exhibits I, J, K, and L to ECF No. 264 sealed. The opinion does not provide additional reasoning beyond the order’s notation that the request was granted.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.