Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 15, 2023

Berry v. U.S. Treasury Department

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-00916
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Berry v. U.S. Treasury Department, Judge Swain ordered Berry to pay $402 or submit an application to proceed without prepaying fees.

Who this affects

Duane L. Berry, whose case could proceed only after he paid the required fees or submitted an IFP application, and whose action would be dismissed if he did neither within 30 days.

What happened

In Berry v. U.S. Treasury Department, Duane L. Berry brought a civil action without a lawyer but did not pay the required fees or submit an application to proceed without prepaying them.

The court gave Berry 30 days to pay $402, consisting of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee, or submit a signed application. No summons would issue at that time, and the action would be dismissed if Berry did not comply.

Judge Swain also stated that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not address the claims in the lawsuit.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Berry v. U.S. Treasury Department · No. 1:23-cv-00916
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 15, 2023

Background

Duane L. Berry filed this civil action without a lawyer. The opinion states that Berry submitted the complaint without paying the required fees and without submitting an application to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called an IFP application.

Order

The court explained that filing a civil action required either payment of $402— a $350 filing fee plus a $52 administrative fee—or a signed IFP application under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court ordered Berry, within 30 days of the order, to pay the fees or submit the attached IFP application. If Berry submitted the application, it was to identify docket number 23-CV-0916 (LTS). The court stated that, if it granted the application, Berry would be allowed to proceed without prepaying fees.

No summons would issue at that time. If Berry complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures. If Berry failed to comply within the allowed period, the action would be dismissed.

Appeal and Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal. This order addressed payment of the filing fee or submission of an IFP application; it did not decide the claims in the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.