Vicinanza v. Horizon Window Treatments, Inc.
- Vyskocil
- 1:22-cv-00657
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Vicinanza v. Horizon Window Treatments, Judge Vyskocil ordered information needed to review the parties’ Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.
The order affected plaintiffs Vincent Vicinanza and Luis Morales and defendants Horizon Window Treatments, Inc. and Eric Abikzer by requiring them to submit information about their Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.
What happened
Vincenza and Morales sued Horizon Window Treatments, Inc. and Eric Abikzer, and the parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement. The claims included claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
The court directed the parties to file a joint letter by March 24, 2023, explaining why the settlement was fair and reasonable. The letter must address the claims, defenses, possible damages, case strengths and weaknesses, settlement negotiations, attorney fees, and other relevant issues. The parties must also provide the fee agreement, details about fees incurred, and a copy of the settlement agreement.
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil entered the order directing this submission under the requirements for reviewing Fair Labor Standards Act settlements. The order did not state that the court approved the settlement.
The detailed version
- Vicinanza v. Horizon Window Treatments, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-00657
- Vyskocil
- Feb. 24, 2023
Background
Vincent Vicinanza and Luis Morales sued Horizon Window Treatments, Inc. and Eric Abikzer. The court was informed that the parties had reached a settlement. The opinion states that the claims included claims arising under the Fair Labor Standards Act, a federal law governing matters such as minimum wages and overtime pay.
Court’s Order
Because the case included Fair Labor Standards Act claims, the court required additional information before evaluating whether the settlement was fair and reasonable. The court directed the parties to file a joint letter by March 24, 2023. The letter must discuss:
- the claims and defenses; - the defendants’ potential monetary exposure and the basis for calculating it; - the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiffs’ claims and the defendants’ defenses; - reasons for any difference between the possible value of the claims and the settlement amount; - the litigation and settlement-negotiation process; and - other issues relevant to whether the settlement is reasonable, including whether a judgment would be collectible if the case went to trial.
The parties also had to explain their attorney-fee arrangement, attach the retainer agreement, provide details about the attorney fees actually incurred, and submit a copy of the settlement agreement.
Disposition
Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil ordered the parties to provide the requested information so the court could evaluate the settlement. The opinion does not state that the court approved or rejected the settlement.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.