Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 28, 2023

Carrion v. Kopp

Judge
Kenneth Karas
Docket
7:22-cv-09445
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
12
Civil RightsSection 1983Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Carrion v. Kopp, Judge Karas dismissed claims against six defendants without prejudice, allowed amendment, and ordered service on two others.

Who this affects

Gilbert Vertecon Carrion and the named defendants. Carrion may amend his claims against Kopp, Griffin, Doulan, Linquenious, Miller, and Martin within 60 days; service will proceed against C.O. Ricardo and Sgt. Trish Johnson.

What happened

In Carrion v. Kopp, Gilbert Vertecon Carrion, who is incarcerated, sued under a federal civil-rights law, alleging that prison officials violated his rights. He alleged that Sgt. Trish Johnson told C.O. Ricardo to assault him and that Ricardo used excessive force, causing injuries.

The court dismissed without prejudice Carrion’s claims against Kopp, Griffin, Doulan, Linquenious, Miller, and Martin because the complaint did not clearly explain what those defendants did or whether the claims were timely. The court gave Carrion 60 days to amend. It ordered the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Ricardo and Johnson and applied a local discovery rule to the case.

Judge Kenneth M. Karas also denied permission to proceed without paying fees for an appeal, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide whether Carrion’s underlying allegations were true.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Carrion v. Kopp · No. 7:22-cv-09445
Judge
Kenneth Karas
Date
Feb. 28, 2023

Background

Gilbert Vertecon Carrion brought this pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a federal law that allows claims for constitutional violations by state actors. He alleged that events occurred while he was incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility. Carrion alleged that, on January 1, 2022, Sgt. Trish Johnson told C.O. Ricardo to assault him. He further alleged that Ricardo falsely reported that Carrion threw a lunch tray and that Ricardo’s use of excessive force caused contusions to Carrion’s right eye and left cheek and knocked him unconscious.

The court had previously allowed Carrion to proceed without prepaying the filing fee. It screened the complaint as required for such cases, considering whether any claim was frivolous, malicious, failed to state a claim, or sought relief from an immune defendant. The court also applied the requirement that a complaint provide enough facts to make a claim plausible.

Claims Against Six Defendants

The court concluded that the complaint did not provide enough facts to determine what Kopp, Griffin, Doulan, Linquenious, Miller, and Martin allegedly did or failed to do. The court also said it was unclear whether the claims against those defendants were timely. It therefore treated the allegations as conclusory and dismissed without prejudice Carrion’s claims against those six defendants for failure to state a claim.

Because Carrion was proceeding without a lawyer, the court granted him 60 days’ leave to amend his complaint to state valid claims against those defendants. The order therefore allowed those claims to be repleaded; it did not resolve their underlying merits.

Service and Discovery

The court directed the Clerk of Court to issue summonses for C.O. Ricardo and Sgt. Trish Johnson, complete the required service forms with their addresses, and deliver the necessary documents to the U.S. Marshals Service. The court extended the service period to 90 days after the summonses were issued. It also directed Carrion to notify the court of any address change.

Local Civil Rule 33.2 applies to the action. Under the order, the defendants must serve responses to the specified prisoner-case interrogatories and document requests within 120 days after service of the complaint.

Other Dispositions

The court certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. Judge Kenneth M. Karas entered the order on February 28, 2023.

Result

The order dismisses without prejudice the claims against Kopp, Griffin, Doulan, Linquenious, Miller, and Martin; grants Carrion 60 days’ leave to amend those claims; directs service on Ricardo and Johnson; and applies Local Civil Rule 33.2.

The authoritative version

Read the full 12-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.