Salley v. Capra
- Kenneth Karas
- 7:23-cv-04566
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 9
In Salley v. Capra, Judge Karas ordered service, identification of a John Doe defendant, and legal-clinic referral in Salley’s equal-protection lawsuit.
Sean Salley, the seven named defendants, the unidentified John Doe defendant, the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and its Attorney General’s Office, the Clerk of Court, the U.S. Marshals Service, and the New York Legal Assistance Group.
What happened
In Salley v. Capra, Sean Salley, who is representing himself, alleges that the defendants treated him differently from similarly situated prisoners at Green Haven Correctional Facility, violating the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.
Because Salley had permission to proceed without paying filing fees in advance, the court ordered the Clerk and U.S. Marshals Service to issue summonses and serve the seven named defendants. The court also ordered the New York State Attorney General’s Office to identify the John Doe defendant and provide that person’s badge number and service address.
Judge Kenneth M. Karas also referred Salley to the New York Legal Assistance Group for possible limited legal assistance. The order addressed service and litigation assistance; it did not decide the merits of Salley’s equal-protection allegations.
The detailed version
- Salley v. Capra · No. 7:23-cv-04566
- Kenneth Karas
- Aug. 23, 2023
Background
Sean Salley, who is incarcerated at Shawangunk Correctional Facility and is proceeding without a lawyer, brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleges that Michael Capra, Mr. Thorpe, C. Nixon, Elane Velez, T. Alam, L. Jackson-Smith, Quandera Quick, and a John Doe defendant treated him differently from similarly situated prisoners while he was incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility. He claims this violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The court had previously granted Salley permission to proceed without prepaying filing fees. That permission does not eliminate a prisoner’s obligation to pay the filing fee over time under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
Service on Named Defendants
Because Salley was allowed to proceed without prepaying fees, the court ordered service by the U.S. Marshals Service. The Clerk of Court was directed to prepare U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return forms, issue summonses, and provide the Marshals Service with the necessary papers to serve Superintendent Michael Capra, Deputy of Security Thorpe, Captain C. Nixon, Deputy Elane Velez, Dr. T. Alam, Deputy L. Jackson-Smith, and Supervisory Quandera Quick.
The order states that if service is not completed within 90 days after the summonses are issued, Salley should ask for an extension of time. Salley must also notify the court in writing if his address changes, and the court may dismiss the action if he fails to do so.
Identifying the John Doe Defendant
The court found that Salley had provided enough information for the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision to identify the John Doe defendant. The court therefore directed the New York State Attorney General, identified as DOCCS’s attorney and agent, to determine the defendant’s identity, badge number, and service address and provide that information to Salley and the court within 60 days of the order.
Within 30 days after receiving that information, Salley must notify the court in writing and ask it to add the identified person as a defendant and direct service through the U.S. Marshals Service.
Legal Assistance Referral
The court referred Salley to the New York Legal Assistance Group’s legal clinic for people representing themselves in civil cases in the Southern District of New York. The order explains that NYLAG is a private organization, not part of the court, and that its assistance would be limited in scope. Salley would remain responsible for his case and deadlines unless NYLAG separately agreed to provide additional assistance or representation.
Disposition
The court ordered service on the named defendants, directed identification of the John Doe defendant, and referred Salley to NYLAG. The order did not decide whether Salley’s equal-protection allegations were legally or factually valid.
Read the full 9-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.