Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 2, 2023

Moslem v. Michael Macklowitz, Esq.

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-01561
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Moslem v. Macklowitz, Judge Swain transferred Moslem’s lawsuit to the Eastern District of New York because venue was proper there.

Who this affects

Mehdi Moslem’s action was transferred from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The transfer affects Moslem and the four named defendants, but the opinion does not decide the underlying claims.

What happened

Mehdi Moslem, representing himself, sued Michael Macklowitz, Esq., Seth Ginsberg, Esq., Dante Demartino, and Drew Smith for damages under diversity jurisdiction. He alleged that events supporting his claims occurred in Queens County, New York.

The court ruled that the Southern District of New York was not shown to be the proper venue because Moslem did not establish that all defendants resided there or that substantial events occurred there. Because Queens County is in the Eastern District of New York, that district was a proper venue.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain transferred the action to the Eastern District of New York in the interest of justice. The order closed the action in the Southern District of New York, and the transferee court will decide whether Moslem may proceed without prepaying fees.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Moslem v. Michael Macklowitz, Esq. · No. 1:23-cv-01561
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 2, 2023

Background

Mehdi Moslem filed a complaint while incarcerated and proceeded without a lawyer. He brought the action under diversity jurisdiction and sought $50,000,000 in damages from Michael Macklowitz, Esq.; Seth Ginsberg, Esq.; Dante Demartino; and Drew Smith. Moslem alleged that he was a citizen of Pennsylvania, that at least three defendants were citizens of New York, and that a substantial part of the events supporting his claims occurred in Queens County, New York.

Venue Analysis

Venue rules identify the federal district where a civil action may be brought. The court explained that venue may be proper where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in some circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction.

The court concluded that Moslem had not alleged enough facts to show that the Southern District of New York was proper under the rule based on defendants’ residence. Demartino and Smith were alleged to reside in Great Neck, Nassau County, which is in the Eastern District of New York. Macklowitz’s alleged residence was unspecified, and Moslem did not specify Ginsberg’s residence. The court also found that Moslem had not alleged that a substantial part of the events occurred in the Southern District of New York.

Moslem did allege that a substantial part of the events occurred in Queens County. Because Queens County is in the Eastern District of New York, the court found that the Eastern District was a proper venue under the rule based on where the events occurred.

Disposition

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), when a case is filed in the wrong venue, the court may transfer it to a district where it could have been brought if transfer serves the interests of justice. The court directed the Clerk of Court to transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. It did not decide the underlying claims. The order states that the transferee court will decide whether Moslem may proceed without prepaying fees; summonses would not issue from the Southern District of New York; and the action was closed in that court.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.