Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 2, 2023

Kasirer LLC v. United States Small Business Administration Office of Capital…

Full caption

Kasirer LLC v. United States Small Business Administration Office of Capital Access

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:22-cv-06989
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Kasirer LLC v. United States Small Business Administration, Judge Caproni granted an application to file the administrative record under seal to protect employee privacy.

Who this affects

Kasirer LLC, the Small Business Administration Office of Capital Access, and Kasirer’s employees whose pay, benefits, and other personal employment information appeared in the administrative record.

What happened

Kasirer LLC v. United States Small Business Administration Office of Capital Access concerned Kasirer’s request for judicial review of the agency’s decision that Kasirer was ineligible for a Paycheck Protection Program loan and loan forgiveness because it engaged in lobbying activities.

The Small Business Administration asked to file the certified administrative record under seal, and Kasirer consented. The agency said the record contained payroll, banking, tax, and human-resources information, including employees’ pay and benefits, that was not relevant to the disputed issues.

Judge Valerie E. Caproni granted the application. The order allowed the administrative record to be filed under seal; it did not decide whether the agency was correct about Kasirer’s loan eligibility or forgiveness.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kasirer LLC v. United States Small Business Administration Office of Capital… · No. 1:22-cv-06989
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
Mar. 2, 2023

Background

Kasirer LLC sought judicial review of a Small Business Administration loan-review decision. According to the government’s submission, the agency determined that Kasirer was ineligible for the Paycheck Protection Program loan it received under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and therefore was also ineligible for later forgiveness of that loan because Kasirer engages in lobbying activities.

The government’s submission identified three issues in the underlying case: whether Kasirer’s application was submitted before publication of an interim rule defining ineligible businesses; whether substantially similar businesses had received loan forgiveness; and whether Kasirer’s primary business activity and core focus was lobbying.

Sealing request

The Small Business Administration asked for permission to file the certified administrative record under seal. Kasirer consented to the request. The government said that much of the record consisted of payroll, banking, tax-return, and human-resources records submitted with Kasirer’s loan-forgiveness application. Those records included specific information about Kasirer’s employees, including their pay and benefits.

The government argued that this information was not relevant to the issues in the litigation and that the privacy interests of the employees supported sealing the record. The submission states that the administrative record was filed under seal, except for Kasirer’s Paycheck Protection Program forgiveness calculator, which was sent to the court and Kasirer by email in its original spreadsheet format.

Ruling

Judge Valerie E. Caproni granted the application. This order addressed only the request to file the administrative record under seal. The opinion text does not resolve the underlying dispute over Kasirer’s loan eligibility or eligibility for forgiveness.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.