Booker v. Murphy
- Laura Swain
- 1:23-cv-00751
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 3
In Booker v. Murphy, Judge Swain transferred Booker’s civil-rights action to the Northern District of New York because the events occurred there.
Diquan Booker’s lawsuit against Officer Murphy was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Northern District of New York; the receiving court will decide whether Booker may proceed without prepaying fees.
What happened
Booker v. Murphy concerns Diquan Booker’s lawsuit claiming that Officer Murphy violated his constitutional rights at Shawangunk Correctional Facility. Booker filed the case without a lawyer while incarcerated.
The court said the events occurred in Ulster County, which is in the Northern District of New York. Because the defendant’s residence was unknown, the court could not determine whether venue was proper in the Southern District, but it found venue proper in the Northern District.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain transferred the action to the Northern District of New York for convenience and in the interest of justice. The order closed the Southern District case, left the fee decision to the receiving court, and denied fee-free appeal status.
The detailed version
- Booker v. Murphy · No. 1:23-cv-00751
- Laura Swain
- Mar. 6, 2023
Background
Diquan Booker, who was incarcerated at Green Correctional Facility, filed this action without a lawyer under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He alleged that Officer Murphy violated his federal constitutional rights at Shawangunk Correctional Facility.
Venue and Transfer
The court explained that federal law generally permits a civil action to proceed where a defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or, in limited circumstances, where a defendant is subject to the court’s authority. Booker did not allege Officer Murphy’s residence. He did allege that the events occurred at Shawangunk, which is in Ulster County and therefore in the Northern District of New York.
The court stated that it was unclear whether venue was proper in the Southern District under the defendant-residence provision because Murphy’s residence was unknown. Even assuming venue was proper in the Southern District, the court concluded that transfer was appropriate under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), which permits transfer to another proper district for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. The court relied on the location of the events and its expectation that relevant documents and witnesses would also be at Shawangunk.
Disposition
The court transferred the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The clerk was directed to carry out the transfer, and the order stated that the Southern District case was closed. The receiving court was left to decide whether Booker could continue without prepaying filing fees, and no summons was to issue from the Southern District. The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.
Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order on March 6, 2023.
Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.