Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Feb. 8, 2024

Salaam v. City of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-08228
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil RightsSection 1983Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Salaam v. City of New York, Judge Swain dismissed the action after Salaam failed to amend, dismissing Section 1983 claims and declining to consider state-law claims.

Who this affects

Aziz Salaam's federal civil-rights claims under Section 1983 were dismissed, and the court declined to consider his state-law claims. The action was dismissed, and permission to proceed without paying court fees for an appeal was denied.

What happened

In Salaam v. City of New York, the court had given Aziz Salaam 60 days to file an amended complaint and warned that failing to do so would lead to dismissal.

Salaam did not file an amended complaint. The court therefore dismissed his claims under Section 1983 for failing to state a claim for which relief could be granted and declined to consider his state-law claims.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the clerk to enter judgment dismissing the action. She also ruled that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying court fees for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Salaam v. City of New York · No. 1:23-cv-08228
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Feb. 8, 2024

Background

The court had previously allowed Aziz Salaam to file an amended complaint within 60 days. That order warned that failure to comply would result in dismissal. It also stated that the court would dismiss Salaam's claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted and would decline to consider his state-law claims under supplemental jurisdiction, which is a federal court's authority to hear related state-law claims.

Ruling

Because Salaam did not file an amended complaint, the court dismissed the action. It dismissed his Section 1983 claims for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and declined to consider his state-law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3). The court also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without paying court fees for an appeal. Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the clerk to issue a judgment dismissing the action.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.