Indiviglio v. B&G Foods, Inc.
- Vincent Briccetti
- 7:22-cv-09545
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In Indiviglio v. B&G Foods, Judge Briccetti ordered plaintiff to state whether she would amend her complaint before the dismissal motion proceeded.
Deena Indiviglio and B&G Foods, Inc.; the order governed whether Indiviglio would amend her complaint and how B&G Foods could respond.
What happened
In Indiviglio v. B&G Foods, Inc., B&G Foods filed a motion asking the court to dismiss Deena Indiviglio’s complaint under federal procedural rules.
The court ordered Indiviglio to notify the court by March 30, 2023, whether she would file an amended complaint or rely on her existing complaint. If she amended it, B&G Foods could answer, file another dismissal motion, or rely on its original motion.
Judge Vincent L. Briccetti issued the order on March 21, 2023. The order did not decide the dismissal motion or the merits of the claims.
The detailed version
- Indiviglio v. B&G Foods, Inc. · No. 7:22-cv-09545
- Vincent Briccetti
- Mar. 21, 2023
Background
B&G Foods filed a motion to dismiss Deena Indiviglio’s complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the arguments in the motion.
Order
The court ordered Indiviglio to notify the court by March 30, 2023, whether she intended to file an amended complaint in response to the motion or rely on the complaint that was already subject to the motion.
If Indiviglio chose not to amend, the motion to dismiss would proceed under the normal schedule, and the court stated that it was unlikely to give her another opportunity to amend to address deficiencies made apparent by the fully briefed motion. If she chose to amend, she had to file the amended complaint within 14 days after notifying the court. Within 21 days after the amendment, B&G Foods could answer, file a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, or notify the court that it would rely on its original motion.
Disposition
The court issued an interim procedural order concerning amendment of the complaint and the next steps for the pending motion to dismiss. It did not grant or deny the motion to dismiss and did not decide the merits of the claims. Judge Vincent L. Briccetti signed the order.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.