Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 23, 2023

Porter v. Chase Bank

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-02436
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Pro SeCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Porter v. Chase Bank, Judge Swain ordered Porter to pay fees or submit an amended application to proceed without prepayment.

Who this affects

Marcell Dominique Porter, who was proceeding without a lawyer, had to pay the fees or submit an adequate amended application within 30 days; otherwise, the action would be dismissed.

What happened

In Porter v. Chase Bank, Marcell Dominique Porter asked to proceed without paying court fees upfront. The court said his application did not provide enough information about his wages and expenses to determine whether he could pay.

The court ordered Porter, within 30 days, either to pay $402 in filing and administrative fees or submit an amended application with facts showing that he cannot pay. The court also said that no summons would issue at that time and that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Porter v. Chase Bank · No. 1:23-cv-02436
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 23, 2023

Background

Marcell Dominique Porter brought the action without a lawyer and submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees. The court explained that a civil plaintiff must either pay $402—comprising a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee—or submit a signed application requesting permission to proceed without prepayment.

Porter’s application stated that he was employed and paid his expenses through “trumpet performance/ music composition massage therapy,” but it did not state his wages or other income. The application also stated that he owned no property, had no monthly housing, transportation, or utility expenses, had no dependents, and owed $6,000 to Citibank and Bank of America.

Court’s Analysis

The court found that Porter had not supplied enough information about his wages and expenses. Because of that deficiency, the court said it could not determine whether he had enough money to pay the filing fees and could not rule on his application at that time.

Order and Effect

The court ordered Porter, within 30 days of the order, either to pay the $402 in fees or submit an amended application. The amended application must use docket number 23-CV-2436 (LTS) and provide facts establishing that Porter cannot pay the fees. If the court grants the amended application, Porter may proceed without prepaying the fees.

No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that, if Porter complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal.

Classification

This is a procedural order concerning the application to proceed without prepaying fees. It did not decide the underlying claims against Chase Bank or the other defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.