DeJesus v. Bon Secours Community Hospital
- Vincent Briccetti
- 7:23-cv-00806
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In DeJesus v. Bon Secours Community Hospital, Judge Briccetti gave Samantha DeJesus a choice about amending her complaint before defendants’ dismissal motion proceeds.
Samantha DeJesus, Bon Secours Community Hospital, and Lyn Wessels.
What happened
DeJesus v. Bon Secours Community Hospital concerns a motion by Bon Secours Community Hospital and Lyn Wessels to dismiss Samantha DeJesus’s complaint. The defendants filed the motion under a rule allowing dismissal for failure to state a legal claim.
The court ordered DeJesus to notify it by April 3, 2023, whether she intends to file an amended complaint or rely on the existing complaint. If she chooses to amend, she must file the amended complaint within 14 days after notifying the court.
Judge Vincent L. Briccetti did not decide the motion to dismiss in this order. He explained that, after an amended complaint, the defendants would have 21 days to answer, file another dismissal motion, or rely on their original motion.
The detailed version
- DeJesus v. Bon Secours Community Hospital · No. 7:23-cv-00806
- Vincent Briccetti
- Mar. 24, 2023
Background
On March 23, 2023, Bon Secours Community Hospital and Lyn Wessels filed a motion to dismiss Samantha DeJesus’s complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). This rule permits a defendant to ask the court to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a legally sufficient claim. The opinion does not decide whether the complaint satisfies that rule.
Order
The court ordered DeJesus to notify the court by April 3, 2023, whether she will either:
1. file an amended complaint in response to the motion; or 2. rely on the complaint that is currently being challenged.
If DeJesus chooses not to amend, the motion to dismiss will proceed under the regular schedule. The court stated that it is unlikely to give her another opportunity to amend later to address deficiencies made apparent by the fully briefed motion, citing circumstances that can justify denying leave to amend, including undue delay, bad faith, dilatory motive, or futility.
If DeJesus chooses to amend, she must file the amended complaint no later than 14 days after notifying the court of that decision. Within 21 days after the amendment, the defendants may file an answer, file a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, or notify the court that they rely on their original motion to dismiss. The deadlines for opposition and reply papers are governed by the federal and local civil rules unless the court orders otherwise.
Disposition
Judge Vincent L. Briccetti’s order directs DeJesus to choose how to proceed and sets deadlines for any amended complaint and the defendants’ response. The order does not grant or deny the pending motion to dismiss.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.