Seaman v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2
- Paul Gardephe
- 1:18-cv-01781
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 19
In Seaman v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2, Judge Moses awarded discovery sanctions but denied non-monetary sanctions.
The order benefits the plaintiffs by awarding $45,063 in fees and costs. Transworld Systems, Inc. and its counsel are jointly and severally responsible for payment; the opinion states that the employee was not subject to monetary sanctions and that no non-monetary sanctions were imposed.
What happened
In Seaman v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2, plaintiffs sought sanctions against Transworld Systems, Inc. and its counsel for waiting more than six months to disclose that a witness had suffered a stroke and left the company. The delay caused plaintiffs to spend unnecessary time litigating the witness’s deposition and delayed that deposition.
The court awarded plaintiffs $44,895 in attorneys’ fees and $168 in costs. It denied the requests for an adverse-inference instruction, preclusion, and orders treating certain facts as established because the plaintiffs eventually obtained the witness’s testimony in time to use it for class certification, and the requested facts could be supported with other evidence.
Judge Moses ordered Transworld Systems and its counsel, jointly and separately, to pay the $45,063 total award within 30 days. The opinion states that monetary sanctions were imposed under a federal law addressing conduct that unnecessarily multiplies court proceedings.
The detailed version
- Seaman v. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-2 · No. 1:18-cv-01781
- Paul Gardephe
- Mar. 24, 2023
Background
This memorandum and order addresses plaintiffs’ renewed sanctions motion in two related actions, including No. 18-CV-1781 and No. 18-CV-7692. Plaintiffs sought sanctions against Transworld Systems, Inc. (TSI) and its counsel because they did not disclose for more than six months that a TSI-affiliated witness had suffered a stroke and had resigned from TSI. The witness had been the subject of a deposition dispute. During the delay, plaintiffs continued litigating objections to an earlier order concerning the witness’s deposition.
After the witness’s medical event became known, plaintiffs agreed to take the deposition through written questions. They completed the deposition by May 19, 2021, and used the resulting testimony in support of their class-certification motion. In an earlier order, the court had found that the delayed disclosure unnecessarily multiplied the proceedings and had allowed plaintiffs to renew their request for non-monetary sanctions after obtaining the deposition testimony. A later order by the district judge upheld sanctions against TSI’s counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1927, a statute that permits recovery of fees and expenses caused by conduct that unnecessarily multiplies proceedings. The earlier ruling also stated that the employee himself would not be subject to monetary sanctions under the circumstances described.
Monetary sanctions
The court determined that plaintiffs could recover reasonable fees and expenses caused by the delayed disclosure, including work opposing the earlier deposition objections and preparing the successful sanctions application. Plaintiffs could not recover for work they would have performed even if TSI had disclosed the medical information promptly.
The court reduced the requested hourly rates. It found reasonable rates of $450 per hour for Marvin Frank, $375 per hour for Gregory Frank, and $300 per hour for Asher Hawkins. The court also reduced some hours for duplicative supervisory work, excluded work outside the scope of the compensable sanctions, and reduced by 50 percent certain time spent preparing the renewed motion because the non-monetary requests were unsuccessful.
The resulting fee award was $36,060 for Hawkins, $5,325 for Gregory Frank, and $3,510 for Marvin Frank, totaling $44,895. The court also awarded $168 in transcript expenses.
Non-monetary sanctions
The court denied the requests for an adverse-inference instruction, preclusion, and orders establishing various facts. It explained that sanctions under Section 1927 are limited to fees and expenses. It also found that plaintiffs had not shown that the six-month disclosure delay prevented them from obtaining relevant facts or presenting them in time. The delay occurred after the witness’s stroke, and plaintiffs ultimately obtained his testimony before filing their class-certification motion. The court therefore did not need to decide how much the stroke affected the witness’s memory. The court further observed that plaintiffs said the facts they sought to establish were supported by the witness’s testimony, other discovery, and documents, so they could attempt to prove those facts without a discovery sanction making them uncontestable.
Disposition
Judge Barbara Moses awarded plaintiffs $44,895 in attorneys’ fees and $168 in costs, for a total of $45,063, against TSI and its counsel jointly and severally. The award was to be paid within 30 days of the memorandum and order. The court imposed no non-monetary sanctions.
Read the full 19-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.