Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Mar. 27, 2023

Scamp v. Higgins Family Trust

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-01418
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Scamp v. Higgins Family Trust, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice after Scamp neither paid the filing fee nor submitted a fee-waiver application.

Who this affects

The dismissal affects Loretta Gay Scamp’s complaint against Higgins Family Trust and the other named defendants. The court’s ruling also denied Scamp fee-waiver status for an appeal.

What happened

In Scamp v. Higgins Family Trust, Loretta Gay Scamp was representing herself. The court had ordered her to either pay the $402 filing fee or submit an application to proceed without paying the fee.

Scamp did neither within the required 30 days. Instead, she filed documents including a notice of appeal from the fee-related order and documents referring to herself as a “Moor Irish beneficiary” and citing treaties.

The court ruled that the appeal was defective because it challenged a nonfinal order that had not been approved for an immediate appeal. Judge Laura Taylor Swain therefore retained jurisdiction and dismissed the complaint without prejudice for failure to follow the court’s order. The court also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal and directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Scamp v. Higgins Family Trust · No. 1:23-cv-01418
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Mar. 27, 2023

Background

Loretta Gay Scamp was proceeding without a lawyer. On February 22, 2023, the court ordered her, within 30 days, either to submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee or to pay the $402 required to file a civil action. The order warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint.

Scamp did not submit the fee or the application. Instead, she filed a “Master Bill of Lading, Ships Manifest Non-Negotiable Bill of Exceptions to the Order Directing Payment of Fee or IFP Application,” a notice of interlocutory appeal, and another document referring to herself as a “Moor Irish beneficiary” and citing treaties.

Appeal and jurisdiction

The court held that it retained authority to decide the case despite the notice of appeal. The notice challenged a nonfinal order directing Scamp to pay the fee or submit the application, and that order had not been certified for an immediate appeal. The court therefore found the notice of appeal “plainly defective” and concluded that it did not transfer authority over the case to the appeals court.

Ruling

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice for failure to comply with its February 22 order. “Without prejudice” means the dismissal did not bar refiling, although the opinion does not state what requirements would apply to any later filing. The court certified that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and denied Scamp permission to proceed without paying the fee for purposes of an appeal. It directed the Clerk of Court to enter judgment.

Date note

The supplied case information lists March 27, 2023, as the filing date, while the opinion’s signature block states “Dated: March 27, 2022.”

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.