Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 4, 2023

Gibson v. Scarr Pizza, LLC

Judge
John Cronan
Docket
1:23-cv-00345
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Gibson v. Scarr Pizza, Judge Cronan granted in part a request to postpone filings and ordered a settlement update by May 1, 2023.

Who this affects

The plaintiff and the other parties to the case, because the order required the plaintiff to file a settlement-related stipulation or status letter by May 1, 2023.

What happened

In Gibson v. Scarr Pizza, LLC, the plaintiff’s lawyer told the court that all parties had reached a settlement in principle and asked to postpone required filings while they completed the settlement documents.

The court granted the request in part. It ordered the plaintiff to file a settlement stipulation or a status letter about the settlement by May 1, 2023.

Judge John P. Cronan issued the order on April 4, 2023. The provided text does not specify what part of the request was denied or otherwise not granted.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gibson v. Scarr Pizza, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-00345
Judge
John Cronan
Date
Apr. 4, 2023

Background

The plaintiff’s lawyer asked the court to postpone any required filings indefinitely while the parties completed documents for a settlement that the lawyer said had been reached in principle among all parties. The lawyer stated that the plaintiff would file a dismissal notice after the documents were completed.

Ruling

The court wrote, “Request is granted in part.” It ordered the plaintiff to file a stipulation or a status letter concerning the settlement no later than May 1, 2023. The provided opinion text does not identify which part of the request was not granted. Judge John P. Cronan signed the order.

Effect

The order set a deadline for the plaintiff to provide either the required stipulation or an update about the settlement. It did not, in the provided text, enter a dismissal or describe the final terms of the settlement.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.