Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 6, 2023

Torres v. U.S. Department of Justice

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-02358
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Torres v. U.S. Department of Justice, Judge Swain dismissed the duplicate complaint without prejudice and denied appeal-related fee status.

Who this affects

Wilfredo Torres and the defendants named in this duplicate complaint; the issues were left for resolution in Torres’s pending case.

What happened

In Torres v. U.S. Department of Justice, Wilfredo Torres, representing himself, alleged that a court clerk and defense counsel mishandled or fabricated an order in his pending case. He also alleged that they committed crimes to conceal other wrongdoing.

The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice because Torres was already raising the same issue in his pending case before Judge Ramos. The court said the presence of the Justice Department as a defendant in this case, but not in the earlier case, did not justify allowing this duplicate lawsuit to continue.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. Her order left the issues for resolution in Torres’s pending case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Torres v. U.S. Department of Justice · No. 1:23-cv-02358
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
Apr. 6, 2023

Background

Wilfredo Torres brought the action without a lawyer. He alleged that, in his pending case under docket number 19-CV-6332 (ER), the Clerk of Court failed to mail him an order addressing defendants’ motion for a stay. He further alleged that defense counsel fabricated an order, forged Judge Ramos’s signature, and replaced the legitimate order on the docket. Torres characterized the alleged conduct as criminal and connected it to allegations involving a “Deep State-CIA-FBI-COINTELPRO’s domestic assassinations program.”

Reason for Dismissal

The court noted that Torres had already raised the same issue in the pending case, including in filings identified as docket entries 216 and 220. Because this complaint duplicated issues already being litigated before Judge Ramos, the court concluded that no useful purpose would be served by allowing a separate lawsuit to proceed. The court dismissed the complaint without prejudice to resolution of those issues in the pending case. The court also stated that the Justice Department’s status as a defendant in this action, even though it was not a party to the pending case, did not justify proceeding with this duplicate action.

Additional Ruling

The court repeated an earlier warning that continued filing of nonmeritorious actions could lead to limits on Torres’s ability to proceed without paying filing fees in new cases. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), the court certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without paying filing fees. Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order.

Disposition

The complaint was dismissed without prejudice as duplicative of the pending case under docket number 19-CV-6332 (ER). Appeal-related permission to proceed without paying filing fees was denied.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.