Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled Apr. 20, 2023

CrossBorder Solutions v. Macias

Judge
Nelson Roman
Docket
7:20-cv-04877
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedureEvidence
In one sentence

CrossBorder Solutions v. Macias, Gini, & O’Connell, Judge Roman granted Plaintiffs’ request to file specified documents under seal.

Who this affects

The order affects CrossBorder Solutions, Inc., Cross Border Transactions, LLC d/b/a CrossBorder Solutions, Macias, Gini & O’Connell, LLP, and Sanjay Agarwal by restricting public access to the specified filings and exhibits.

What happened

In CrossBorder Solutions, Inc. n/k/a Exactera Inc. v. Macias, Gini, & O’Connell, LLP, the plaintiffs asked to seal briefs, a factual statement, and exhibits containing confidential business information.

The plaintiffs said the materials included trade-secret information, client and customer information, pricing, costs, renewal rates, and related information. The defendants consented to the request.

Judge Nelson S. Roman granted the request, directed the Clerk to place the specified docket entries under seal for access only by the court and the parties, and directed the Clerk to terminate the motion.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
CrossBorder Solutions v. Macias · No. 7:20-cv-04877
Judge
Nelson Roman
Date
Apr. 20, 2023

Nature of the Order

This was an order on Plaintiffs CrossBorder Solutions, Inc. and Cross Border Transactions, LLC d/b/a CrossBorder Solutions’ request for permission to file specified documents under seal. The order did not decide the parties’ summary-judgment motions or the underlying dispute.

Documents at Issue

The request covered Plaintiffs’ reply brief, opposition brief, and responses to Defendants’ statement of undisputed material facts, along with specified exhibits. The materials included excerpts of CrossBorder’s trade-secret Master List; deposition excerpts; a stipulation; documents submitted in an arbitration; a declaration; and an email.

Court’s Analysis

The court considered the presumption that judicial documents should generally be available to the public and weighed that presumption against privacy and confidentiality interests. The court found that the documents contained confidential and proprietary non-public information, including information about CrossBorder’s clients, costs, renewal rates, customer preferences, pricing, and the substance and safeguards of the trade-secret Master List. The court concluded that the parties’ interests in protecting this information overcame the presumption of public access. Defendants Macias, Gini & O’Connell, LLP and Sanjay Agarwal consented to the request.

Ruling

Judge Nelson S. Roman granted Plaintiffs’ request to file the identified documents under seal. The court directed the Clerk to place ECF Nos. 259, 260, 261, 262, 262-1, 262-2, 262-3, 262-4, 262-5, 262-6, 262-7, 262-8, and 262-9 under seal, accessible only to the court and the parties. The court also directed the Clerk to terminate the motion at ECF No. 274.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.