Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 1, 2023

Brown v. Castle Navigation, Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:22-cv-09001
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Brown v. Castle Navigation, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without costs, preserving possible restoration within 30 days.

Who this affects

Lamar Brown, Castle Navigation, Inc., and the people Brown sought to represent.

What happened

Brown v. Castle Navigation, Inc. was a case brought by Lamar Brown for himself and others similarly situated against Castle Navigation, Inc. The court was told that the case had been settled.

The court discontinued the action without costs to either party. It allowed an application to restore the case to the court’s docket if filed within 30 days; later applications could be denied solely because they were late. The order also stated that any request for the court to retain authority to enforce the settlement had to meet the conditions described in the order.

Judge Ronnie Abrams directed the Clerk of Court to close the case. The order did not describe the settlement’s terms or decide the underlying claims.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Brown v. Castle Navigation, Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-09001
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
May 1, 2023

Background

Lamar Brown brought the action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated against Castle Navigation, Inc. The opinion states that the Court was informed that the case had been settled. It does not provide the settlement’s terms or describe the underlying claims.

Order

The Court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 30 days. It stated that an application to reopen filed after that period could be denied solely because it was late.

The order further stated that, if the parties wanted the Court to retain jurisdiction—that is, authority—to enforce the settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the Court within the period stated in the order. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

Disposition

The Court discontinued the action without costs and without prejudice to a timely application to restore it. Judge Ronnie Abrams did not decide the merits of the underlying claims in this order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.