Vickers v. Department of Veteran's Affairs
- Lewis Liman
- 1:22-cv-01781
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Vickers v. Department of Veteran’s Affairs, Judge Liman denied default judgment because required procedural steps were missing and the defendant was not in default.
Astya Vickers’s request for a default judgment was denied; the Department of Veteran’s Affairs will continue to defend against the amended complaint and its pending motion to dismiss remains unresolved.
What happened
In Vickers v. Department of Veteran’s Affairs, Astya Vickers asked the court to enter a default judgment against the Department of Veteran’s Affairs. The Department opposed the request.
The court explained that a party must first obtain an entry of default from the court clerk before asking for a default judgment. Vickers had not obtained that entry. The court also said that any earlier default would have become moot after Vickers filed an amended complaint. In addition, the court stated that the motion would fail because the service materials did not show compliance with the rules for serving a federal agency, and the Department had received an extension and filed a motion to dismiss before default could occur.
Judge Lewis J. Liman denied Vickers’s motion for default judgment and directed the clerk to close the motion. The court said the ruling did not predict how it would decide the pending motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
The detailed version
- Vickers v. Department of Veteran's Affairs · No. 1:22-cv-01781
- Lewis Liman
- May 3, 2023
Background
Astya Vickers moved for entry of default judgment against the Department of Veteran’s Affairs. The Department opposed the motion.
Court’s reasoning
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55 requires two steps before a court can enter a default judgment against a party that failed to defend. First, the clerk must enter a default, formally recognizing the party’s failure to defend. Only afterward may the plaintiff seek a default judgment, which can end the litigation and award relief allowed by the pleadings.
Vickers did not ask the clerk to enter a default before moving for default judgment. The court therefore held that the motion had to be denied.
The court identified additional reasons the motion could not succeed. Vickers had filed an amended complaint after the court granted leave to amend. The court explained that when an amended complaint becomes operative, any earlier entry of default becomes moot, meaning it no longer provides a basis for a default judgment. The court also stated that the motion would fail because Vickers’s affidavit of service did not show compliance with the procedures for serving the United States and a federal agency. Finally, the Department had obtained an extension to respond and filed its motion to dismiss before Vickers sought default judgment, so the Department was not in default when the motion was filed.
Disposition
The court denied the motion for default judgment and directed the clerk to close Docket No. 10. The court stated that nothing in the order should be understood as predicting its decision on the pending motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Judge Lewis J. Liman signed the order.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.