Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 4, 2023

Young v. MediaCo Holding Inc.

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:22-cv-08924
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Young v. MediaCo Holding, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled-in-principle action without costs, allowing restoration within 45 days.

Who this affects

Leshaun Young, the persons she sought to represent, and MediaCo Holding Inc.; the case was closed, subject to a possible application to restore it within 45 days.

What happened

In Leshaun Young v. MediaCo Holding Inc., the court was told that the parties had settled the case in principle. The opinion does not provide the settlement’s terms or say that the court approved a final settlement.

The court discontinued the action without costs to any party. It allowed either side to seek restoration of the case within 45 days of the order, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

Judge Ronnie Abrams also stated that any request for the court to retain authority to enforce a settlement had to place the settlement terms on the public record and obtain the court’s approval within the same 45-day period.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Young v. MediaCo Holding Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-08924
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
May 4, 2023

Background

Leshaun Young brought this action on behalf of herself and other similarly situated persons against MediaCo Holding Inc. The court was informed that the case had been settled in principle. The opinion does not state the settlement’s terms, whether a class had been certified, or whether the court had approved a final settlement.

Order

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 45 days. It stated that any application to reopen the action had to be filed within 45 days of the order and that a later application could be denied solely because it was late.

The court further stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain authority to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 45-day period. The Clerk of Court was directed to close the case.

Effect

This order ended the action on the court’s docket based on the reported settlement in principle; it did not decide the underlying claims. The court’s order did not describe the settlement or enter a final merits judgment. Judge Ronnie Abrams signed the order on May 4, 2023.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.