Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 5, 2023

Palacios Alvarado v. Gillis

Judge
Katharine Parker
Docket
1:22-cv-10082
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
HabeasImmigrationCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Palacios Alvarado v. Gillis, Judge Parker allowed the government to file relevant detention documents instead of the full immigration administrative record.

Who this affects

Lucas Palacios Alvarado and the government respondents, including the Department of Homeland Security, are affected by the order governing what records the government must file.

What happened

In Palacios Alvarado v. Gillis, Lucas Palacios Alvarado asked the court to order the Department of Homeland Security to release him from custody. The government was required to respond and file the administrative record from his immigration proceedings.

The government explained that immigration-detention habeas cases generally use a response with documents relevant to the detention challenge rather than the complete administrative record. It also stated that the substance of Palacios Alvarado’s removal case was pending before the Second Circuit, leaving detention as the issue in this case.

The court relieved the government of its obligation to file the complete administrative record and permitted it to file a response with documents relevant to its position. Judge Katharine H. Parker entered that order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Palacios Alvarado v. Gillis · No. 1:22-cv-10082
Judge
Katharine Parker
Date
May 5, 2023

Background

Lucas Palacios Alvarado filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, seeking an order directing the Department of Homeland Security to release him from custody and requesting other appropriate relief. The court had ordered the government to respond by May 23, 2023, and to file an administrative record containing documents from the underlying immigration proceedings, including hearings, transcripts, briefs, and opinions.

Government’s request

The government asked to be relieved of the requirement to file the complete administrative record. It explained that, in immigration-detention habeas cases, the government generally files a return—a response supported by documents relevant to the petition—instead of the full administrative record from the immigration proceedings.

The government also stated that the merits of Palacios Alvarado’s removal were before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in a pending petition for review. It characterized the only issue in this habeas case as whether his detention was proper. The letter cited federal laws and court decisions concerning the division of authority between district courts and the courts of appeals over challenges to removal orders.

Ruling

Judge Katharine H. Parker ordered that the government was relieved of its obligation to file a complete administrative record. The court permitted the government instead to file a return containing documents relevant to its response. The order did not decide whether Palacios Alvarado’s detention was lawful or whether he was entitled to release.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.