Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 9, 2023

Paulino v. Bronx County Supreme Court

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-03861
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Paulino v. Bronx County Supreme Court, Judge Swain ordered Luis Paulino to pay fees or correct his prisoner authorization before the case could proceed.

Who this affects

Luis Paulino, an incarcerated plaintiff proceeding without a lawyer who sought permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

Paulino v. Bronx County Supreme Court concerns Luis Paulino’s request to proceed without paying court fees upfront while incarcerated. He submitted the required application and authorization, but the authorization covered only $150 of the required $350 filing fee.

The court gave Paulino 30 days to either pay the full $402 in fees or submit a corrected authorization allowing installment payments from his prison account. The court said no summons would issue yet and warned that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also denied permission to appeal without paying fees, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the claims’ merits.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Paulino v. Bronx County Supreme Court · No. 1:23-cv-03861
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
May 9, 2023

Background

Luis Paulino, who was incarcerated at Green Haven Correctional Facility, filed this action without a lawyer. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. Under the applicable federal statutes, a prisoner must either pay $402 in fees or request permission to proceed without prepayment and authorize collection of the $350 filing fee in installments from the prisoner’s account. The $402 consists of a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee; the administrative fee does not apply to a person granted permission to proceed without prepaying fees.

Problem with the Authorization

Paulino’s authorization allowed collection of only $150, rather than the full $350 filing fee. The court therefore directed him, within 30 days of the order, to either pay the $402 in fees or complete and submit the attached corrected prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 23-CV-3861 (LTS).

Rulings and Consequences

The court did not issue a summons at that time. It stated that the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures if Paulino complied, and that the action would be dismissed if he failed to comply within the allowed period. The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not address the underlying claims. Judge Laura Taylor Swain signed the order as Chief United States District Judge. A footnote cautioned that a later dismissal as frivolous or for failure to state a claim could count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), potentially affecting a prisoner’s ability to proceed without prepaying fees in future cases.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.