Rossete v. Hong Kong Kitchen Inc.
- Stewart Aaron
- 1:22-cv-03049
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 2
In Rossete v. Hong Kong Kitchen, Judge Aaron required the parties to submit materials for court review of their Fair Labor Standards Act settlement.
The order affects the plaintiffs, the defendants, and their attorneys by requiring them to submit information and the settlement agreement for the court’s fairness review.
What happened
Rossete v. Hong Kong Kitchen (USA) Inc. involves Arturo Velazquez Rossete and Crescencio Calva Cruz, who sued individually and on behalf of others similarly situated over claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. After a settlement conference, the parties reached a settlement.
The court required the parties to file a joint letter or motion by May 31, 2023, explaining whether the settlement was fair and reasonable. The filing must discuss the claims, defenses, potential damages, the strengths and weaknesses of the case, the negotiations, attorney fees, the fee agreement, and the settlement agreement itself.
Judge Stewart D. Aaron issued the order on May 17, 2023. The order required the parties to provide information for the court’s review; it did not itself approve the settlement.
The detailed version
- Rossete v. Hong Kong Kitchen Inc. · No. 1:22-cv-03049
- Stewart Aaron
- May 17, 2023
Background
Arturo Velazquez Rossete and Crescencio Calva Cruz brought the case individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated. The order states that the case includes one or more claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. After a settlement conference, the parties reached a settlement.
What the Court Required
The court required the parties to file a joint letter or motion addressing whether the settlement is fair and reasonable. The filing was due by May 31, 2023. The court directed the parties to discuss the claims and defenses, the defendants’ possible monetary exposure and the basis for calculating it, the strengths and weaknesses of the plaintiffs’ case, the defendants’ defenses, reasons for any difference between the possible value of the claims and the settlement amount, and the litigation and negotiation process. The court also identified collectability of a judgment as an example of another potentially relevant issue.
The parties also had to explain their attorney-fee arrangement, attach the retainer agreement, provide information about the actual attorney fees incurred and the attorneys’ relevant experience, and attach the settlement agreement.
Disposition and Effect
The order directed the parties to submit materials for review under the requirements identified in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., a Second Circuit decision concerning review of settlements involving Fair Labor Standards Act claims. The opinion does not state that the court approved or rejected the settlement. Judge Stewart D. Aaron entered the order on May 17, 2023.
Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.