Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 17, 2023

Chowdhury v. Best Wireless 23rd Park Inc

Judge
Stewart Aaron
Docket
1:22-cv-11005
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Fee PetitionFlsa
In one sentence

In Chowdhury v. Best Wireless 23rd Park, Judge Aaron ordered Plaintiff to provide fee information and a signed settlement agreement.

Who this affects

Farzana Chowdhury and the attorneys seeking fees in connection with the proposed settlement.

What happened

In Farzana Chowdhury v. Best Wireless 23rd Park Inc. et al., Plaintiff asked the court to approve a settlement. The order does not state whether the settlement was approved.

Judge Aaron ordered Plaintiff to provide information about the attorney fees actually spent and the attorneys’ relevant experience. The order cited decisions explaining that courts independently review whether requested fees are reasonable, including when fees are calculated as a percentage of the settlement.

The court also ordered Plaintiff to file a fully signed copy of the settlement agreement by May 24, 2023. Judge Stewart D. Aaron issued the order on May 17, 2023.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Chowdhury v. Best Wireless 23rd Park Inc · No. 1:22-cv-11005
Judge
Stewart Aaron
Date
May 17, 2023

Background

Plaintiff Farzana Chowdhury submitted a letter seeking approval of a settlement. The order refers to the settlement and to attorney-fee issues in Fair Labor Standards Act cases, but it does not describe the underlying claims or the proposed settlement’s terms.

Court’s Analysis and Order

After reviewing Plaintiff’s letter, the court required Plaintiff to provide two items by May 24, 2023:

1. Information about the actual attorney fees expended and the relevant experience of the attorney or attorneys supporting the fee request. 2. A fully executed, meaning fully signed, copy of the settlement agreement.

The court cited decisions stating that courts must independently determine whether requested attorney fees are reasonable. Those decisions explain that even when fees are calculated as a percentage of a settlement, courts may also examine the attorneys’ hours and costs using the lodestar method, which estimates fees by multiplying reasonable hours by a reasonable hourly rate.

Disposition

The order required Plaintiff to submit the additional fee information and signed settlement agreement. It did not state that the settlement was approved or denied. Judge Stewart D. Aaron issued the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.