Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 25, 2023

Breland v. Commissioner of Social Security

Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Docket
1:20-cv-05576
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Fee PetitionSocial SecurityCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Breland v. Commissioner of Social Security, Judge Ramos granted Breland’s fee motion, awarded $24,569, and ordered counsel to refund $8,825 to Breland.

Who this affects

Cameisa Lavel Breland, her counsel, and the Commissioner of Social Security; the order directly awarded attorney’s fees to Breland’s counsel and required a refund to Breland.

What happened

Cameisa Lavel Breland sued the Commissioner of Social Security to challenge a denial of Disability Insurance Benefits. In this opinion, the court considered Breland’s request for $24,569 in attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act.

A magistrate judge recommended granting the request. Neither party objected, so the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error and found none.

The court adopted the recommendation and granted Breland’s motion. Judge Ramos awarded $24,569 in attorney’s fees and ordered Breland’s counsel to promptly refund Breland $8,825 previously paid under that law.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Breland v. Commissioner of Social Security · No. 1:20-cv-05576
Judge
Edgardo Ramos
Date
May 25, 2023

Background

Cameisa Lavel Breland brought an action seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her eligibility for Disability Insurance Benefits under 42 U.S.C. § 205(g). The issue in this opinion was Breland’s motion for $24,569 in attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act.

Report and Recommendation

Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron recommended granting the fee motion. The parties were given fourteen days to submit written objections, but no objection was filed.

Court’s Analysis

The district court explained that it could adopt the portions of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to which no timely objection was made unless the record showed clear error. The court reviewed Magistrate Judge Aaron’s recommendation and found no error, clear or otherwise.

Disposition

The court adopted the recommendation and granted Breland’s motion. It awarded her counsel $24,569 in attorney’s fees and ordered counsel, upon receiving that amount, to promptly refund $8,825 to Breland. The court stated that this was the amount of attorney’s fees previously paid to counsel under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The Clerk was directed to terminate the motion.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.