Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled May 31, 2023

Toro v. Mya Saray, LLC

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:23-cv-01865
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil ProcedureClass Action
In one sentence

In Toro v. Mya Saray, LLC, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without prejudice to timely restoration.

Who this affects

Luis Toro, Mya Saray, LLC, and the people whom Toro sought to represent as similarly situated.

What happened

Toro v. Mya Saray, LLC was brought by Luis Toro for himself and others similarly situated against Mya Saray, LLC. The court was told that the case had been settled in principle.

The opinion does not describe the claims, the settlement terms, or whether the settlement received final approval. It states only that the parties reported an agreement in principle.

Judge Abrams discontinued the case without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring it if an application is made within 30 days. The clerk was directed to close the case; the order also set conditions for reopening the case or asking the court to retain authority to enforce a settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Toro v. Mya Saray, LLC · No. 1:23-cv-01865
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
May 31, 2023

Background

Luis Toro brought this action on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated against Mya Saray, LLC. The court stated that it had been reported that the case was settled in principle. The opinion does not provide the underlying claims or the terms of the proposed settlement.

Court’s Action

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it is made within 30 days. It further stated that any application to reopen the action must be filed within 30 days of the order, and that an application filed later may be denied solely because it was late. The clerk was directed to close the case.

The court also stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain authority to enforce a settlement agreement, the agreement’s terms had to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period. Judge Ronnie Abrams did not decide the underlying claims or describe the settlement’s terms.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.