Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 9, 2023

Kuan v. Notoriety Group LLC

Judge
Rochon
Docket
1:22-cv-01583
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
EmploymentFlsaCivil Procedure
In one sentence

In Kuan v. Notoriety Group LLC, Judge Rochon granted default judgment for Megan Kuan, awarding $37,281.70 plus interest.

Who this affects

Megan Kuan received default judgment against Notoriety Group LLC, Anthony Shnayderman, Nathan Leong, and Niv Shaked. The defendants are subject to the monetary judgment and specified interest.

What happened

Megan Kuan sued Notoriety Group LLC and three individual defendants under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law. A magistrate judge recommended entering default judgment and awarding damages, fees, and costs.

No party objected to that recommendation within the required 14-day period. The court therefore reviewed it only for clear error and found that its reasoning, factual findings, and calculations were sound.

Judge Jennifer L. Rochon adopted the recommendation in full and granted Kuan’s motion for default judgment. The Clerk was directed to enter judgment for $37,281.70, plus nine-percent yearly interest on $15,183 in unpaid wages and tips and post-judgment interest, and to close the case.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Kuan v. Notoriety Group LLC · No. 1:22-cv-01583
Judge
Rochon
Date
June 9, 2023

Background

Megan Kuan asserted claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act and New York Labor Law against Notoriety Group LLC and its owners or managers, Anthony Shnayderman, Nathan Leong, and Niv Shaked. The court considered a magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation recommending default judgment for Kuan.

Review of the Recommendation

Kuan served the Report and Recommendation on the defendants on May 22, 2023. The recommendation warned that objections had to be filed within 14 days and that failing to object would waive further review and could prevent appellate review. No party filed an objection.

Because there were no timely objections, the court reviewed the recommendation for clear error, meaning an obvious mistake in the record. The court found that the recommendation properly evaluated Kuan’s claims and requested relief, and that its reasoning and calculations were supported by the facts and law.

Ruling and Award

The court adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and granted Kuan’s motion for default judgment. A default judgment is a judgment entered when a party has not defended the case. The Clerk was directed to enter judgment against the defendants and in Kuan’s favor for a total of $37,281.70, consisting of:

- $933.00 in unpaid wages; - $14,250 in tips; - $70.50 in spread-of-hours pay; - $15,253.50 in liquidated damages; - $6,260.50 in attorneys’ fees; and - $514.20 in costs.

The judgment also includes prejudgment interest on the unpaid wages and tips, which total $15,183, at nine percent per year. Post-judgment interest is to be calculated from the date the Clerk enters judgment until payment. The court stated that the lack of timely objections, after clear notice of the consequences, precludes appellate review of the decision. The Clerk was directed to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.