Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 15, 2023

Moodie v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-04970
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
4
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Moodie v. Consolidated Edison, Judge Swain transferred the pro se case to the Eastern District of New York because Brooklyn was the center of the alleged events.

Who this affects

The order affects Donna Hope Moodie and the four named defendants by moving the case from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York. The transferee court will decide whether Moodie may proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

In Moodie v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Donna Hope Moodie, representing herself, sued Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Bruce Kemp, Richard W. Babinecz, and Dean R. Brown for damages. She alleged that the removal of her Con Edison electrical meter violated her Fourth Amendment rights.

The court explained that the alleged events occurred at Moodie’s residence in Brooklyn, which is in the Eastern District of New York. Although venue might also have been proper in the Southern District of New York, the court found that the Eastern District would be more convenient because the relevant witnesses and documents would likely be there.

The court directed the clerk to transfer the action to the Eastern District of New York under the federal transfer statute. Judge Laura Taylor Swain closed the action in the Southern District of New York, stated that the transferee court would decide whether Moodie could proceed without prepaying fees, and denied fee-free status for any appeal from the transfer order.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Moodie v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York · No. 1:23-cv-04970
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 15, 2023

Background

Donna Hope Moodie filed this action without a lawyer and sought damages. She invoked federal-question jurisdiction and alleged that the removal of her Con Edison electrical meter was an unlawful seizure of property that violated the Fourth Amendment. She named Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Bruce Kemp, whom she identified as a city marshal, Richard W. Babinecz, whom she identified as an attorney, and Dean R. Brown, whom she identified as an attorney/employee.

Venue and Transfer

The court considered the federal venue statute, which identifies where a civil action may be filed. Moodie did not state where any defendant resided. The court therefore said it was unclear whether venue was proper in the Southern District of New York based on the defendants’ residences. The court nevertheless concluded that venue was proper in the Eastern District of New York because Moodie alleged that the events occurred at her residence in Brooklyn, Kings County, which is located in that district.

The court then applied the federal transfer statute, which permits a court to transfer a case to another federal district for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. It found that transfer was appropriate because the alleged events occurred in Brooklyn and relevant documents and witnesses could reasonably be expected to be located in the Eastern District of New York.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The order closed the action in the Southern District of New York, and summonses were not to issue from that court. The court left to the transferee court the question whether Moodie could proceed without prepaying fees. It also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-free status for an appeal from the order. The court did not decide the merits of Moodie’s constitutional or statutory claims.

The authoritative version

Read the full 4-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.