Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 16, 2023

Envivo, LLC v. NYP Holdings, Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:23-cv-03281
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil ProcedureContract
In one sentence

In Envivo v. NYP Holdings, Judge Caproni dismissed the settled case with prejudice, without costs, and closed it.

Who this affects

Envivo, LLC; NYP Holdings, Inc., doing business as “New York Post”; and the listed Doe defendants.

What happened

Envivo, LLC and NYP Holdings, Inc. told the court they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The case also listed Does 1-10 as defendants.

The court canceled all scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning the case was ended, and ordered that neither party pay costs or attorneys’ fees.

Judge Caproni directed the Clerk of Court to terminate open motions and close the case. She allowed the parties to ask to reopen it within 30 days for good cause, and explained how they could ask the court to retain jurisdiction to enforce their settlement agreement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Envivo, LLC v. NYP Holdings, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-03281
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
June 16, 2023

Background

On June 15, 2023, the parties notified the court that they had reached an agreement in principle resolving all issues. The opinion does not describe the underlying claims or the settlement’s terms.

Ruling

The court canceled all previously scheduled conferences and other deadlines. It dismissed the case with prejudice and without costs, including attorneys’ fees, to either party. It also directed the Clerk of Court to terminate all open motions and close the case.

The order allowed the parties to apply to reopen the case within 30 days. Such an application had to show good cause for keeping the case open in light of the settlement, and a late application or one without a showing of good cause could be denied on that basis. The court also stated that, if the parties wanted it to retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement, they had to submit the agreement and request an order expressly retaining jurisdiction within the same 30-day period. Judge Valerie Caproni signed the order.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.