Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 16, 2023

Gardner-Alfred v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Judge
Lewis Liman
Docket
1:22-cv-01585
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
15
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Gardner-Alfred v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Judge Liman ordered that attached correspondence from Mr. Duane Berry be disregarded.

Who this affects

The order concerns the court record and the attached correspondence from Mr. Duane Berry. The opinion does not state any effect on the plaintiffs’ claims or the defendant’s defenses.

What happened

Gardner-Alfred v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York concerns correspondence the court received from Mr. Duane Berry. The order refers to a June 13, 2023 letter from the parties but does not describe either document’s contents.

The court said it would disregard the attached correspondence in accordance with the parties’ letter. The order does not rule on the case’s underlying claims or defenses.

Judge Lewis J. Liman entered the order on June 16, 2023. The opinion does not explain any further effect of disregarding the correspondence.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Gardner-Alfred v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York · No. 1:22-cv-01585
Judge
Lewis Liman
Date
June 16, 2023

Background

The court stated that it received attached correspondence from Mr. Duane Berry. It referred to the parties’ June 13, 2023 letter, identified as Dkt. No. 156, but did not describe the correspondence or the letter in further detail.

Ruling

The court ordered that it would disregard Mr. Berry’s attached correspondence pursuant to the parties’ June 13 letter. Judge Lewis J. Liman signed the order.

Scope of the Order

The opinion is limited to the treatment of the correspondence. It does not decide the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims, the defendant’s defenses, or any other motion or issue.

The authoritative version

Read the full 15-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.