Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 20, 2023

DeVore v. Mayorkas

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-03821
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In DeVore v. Mayorkas, Judge Swain dismissed the complaint without prejudice after DeVore failed to pay the required filing fees.

Who this affects

Arthur G.H. DeVore III’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice because he did not pay the required $402 filing fee after the court denied his request to proceed without prepaying fees. His ability to appeal without prepaying fees was also denied.

What happened

In DeVore v. Mayorkas, the court had denied Arthur G.H. DeVore III’s request to proceed without paying filing fees and ordered him to pay $402 within 30 days. The order warned that failure to pay would lead to dismissal.

DeVore did not pay the fees, so the court dismissed his complaint without prejudice. This means the dismissal did not bar him from filing again, although the opinion does not discuss any future filing.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain also ruled that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied DeVore permission to appeal without paying fees. The clerk was directed to terminate pending motions and enter judgment.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
DeVore v. Mayorkas · No. 1:23-cv-03821
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 20, 2023

Background

Arthur G.H. DeVore III filed a civil complaint against Alejandro N. Mayorkas, identified in the caption as Secretary, DHS, Federal Emergency Management Agency. DeVore asked to proceed without prepaying the filing fee.

Court’s action

On May 9, 2023, the court denied DeVore’s application to proceed without prepaying fees. The court ordered him to pay the $402 filing fee within 30 days and stated that failure to comply would result in dismissal.

DeVore did not pay the required fee. The court therefore dismissed the complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The court did not address the underlying claims.

Appeal and case status

The court certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the dismissal would not be taken in good faith. It therefore denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for an appeal. The clerk was directed to terminate all pending motions and enter judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.