Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 22, 2023

Mourning v. Wray

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-05109
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Mourning v. Wray, Judge Swain ordered the incarcerated plaintiff to pay $402 or submit a prisoner authorization within 30 days, or the action will be dismissed.

Who this affects

Jeffery Lee Mourning, who was required to pay the fees or submit the prisoner authorization within 30 days to avoid dismissal of the action; the underlying defendants were not affected by a merits ruling.

What happened

In Mourning v. Wray, Jeffery Lee Mourning filed a civil action while incarcerated and asked to proceed without prepaying court fees. He submitted an application for that status but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

The court gave Mourning 30 days to either pay $402 in fees or submit the signed authorization. The authorization would allow installment payments of the $350 filing fee from his prison account. The court also stated that no summons would issue at that time and that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain denied fee-free status for any appeal from the order, finding that an appeal would not be taken in good faith. The order did not decide the underlying claims against Christopher Wray or the other defendants.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Mourning v. Wray · No. 1:23-cv-05109
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
June 22, 2023

Background

Jeffery Lee Mourning, who was incarcerated at Central San Diego Jail, brought this action without a lawyer. He submitted an application to proceed without prepaying court fees but did not submit the required prisoner authorization.

Court’s Requirements

The court explained that a prisoner must either pay the required fees or request permission to proceed without prepayment by submitting both an application and a prisoner authorization. The order stated that the total amount to pay was $402: a $350 filing fee and a $52 administrative fee. If the court grants permission to proceed without prepayment, the $350 filing fee must still be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The authorization also directs the correctional facility to provide certified account statements for the previous six months and deduct the required payments.

Within 30 days of the order, Mourning had to either pay the $402 or complete and submit the attached prisoner authorization, labeled with docket number 23-CV-5109 (LTS). No summons would issue at that time. The court stated that, if Mourning complied, the Clerk’s Office would process the case under its procedures; if he failed to comply within the allowed time, the action would be dismissed.

Ruling

Judge Laura Taylor Swain certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to proceed without prepaying fees for purposes of an appeal. The order addressed filing requirements and did not decide the merits of Mourning’s claims against Christopher Wray or the other defendants.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.