Sowell v. The New York City Police Department
- Laura Swain
- 1:23-cv-05348
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 6
In Sowell v. New York City Police Department, Judge Swain ordered payment or an IFP application and denied IFP status for any appeal.
Randy Sowell, who was required to pay the fees or submit the required IFP application and prisoner authorization to avoid dismissal of the action.
What happened
In Sowell v. The New York City Police Department, Randy Sowell filed a civil action without paying the required fees or submitting the paperwork needed to proceed without prepaying them. The order states that he is incarcerated and is representing himself.
The court gave Sowell 30 days to either pay $402 in fees or submit a signed application to proceed without prepaying fees and a prisoner authorization. The authorization would allow installment payments of the $350 filing fee from his prison account. No response from the defendants was required at that time.
The court warned that the action would be dismissed if Sowell did not comply within the deadline. Judge Laura Taylor Swain also certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The order did not address the merits of Sowell’s claims.
The detailed version
- Sowell v. The New York City Police Department · No. 1:23-cv-05348
- Laura Swain
- June 27, 2023
Background
Randy Sowell brought this civil action against The New York City Police Department and other defendants. The opinion states that he is incarcerated at Vernon C. Bain Center and is proceeding without a lawyer. The court’s order concerned filing fees and the paperwork required to request permission to proceed without paying those fees in advance; it did not consider whether his underlying claims were legally valid.
Payment or application requirement
The court explained that a prisoner filing a civil action must either pay $402 in fees—$350 for the filing fee and $52 for the administrative fee—or submit a completed application to proceed without prepaying fees, commonly called an IFP application, together with a prisoner authorization. If permission to proceed without prepaying fees is granted, the $350 filing fee must still be collected in installments from the prisoner’s account under the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The $52 administrative fee does not apply to a person granted IFP status.
Sowell submitted the complaint without the fees, a completed IFP application, or a prisoner authorization. The court ordered him, within 30 days of the order, to pay the $402 or submit the required documents labeled with docket number 23-CV-5348 (LTS). No answer from the defendants was required at that stage. The court stated that, if Sowell complied, the case would be processed under the Clerk’s Office procedures, and that the action would be dismissed if he did not comply within the permitted time.
Ruling
Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered Sowell to pay the required fees or submit the IFP application and prisoner authorization. The court did not grant or deny the underlying request to proceed without prepaying fees because Sowell had not yet submitted the required application and authorization. Separately, the court certified that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith and denied IFP status for purposes of an appeal.
Read the full 6-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.