Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled June 30, 2023

Juarez Cristino v. Duke Ellington Gourmet Corp.

Judge
James Cott
Docket
1:20-cv-07546
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Juarez Cristino v. Duke Ellington Gourmet Corp., Judge Cott directed the parties to seek approval of their reported settlement.

Who this affects

The parties to the case, including Juarez Cristino and Duke Ellington Gourmet Corp., were directed to submit a joint request for approval of their settlement.

What happened

In Juarez Cristino v. Duke Ellington Gourmet Corp., the court noted that the parties had reached a settlement on all issues after mediation.

The court directed the parties to file a joint motion and their settlement agreement by July 31, 2023. The motion must explain why the settlement is fair and reasonable and complies with applicable Second Circuit requirements.

Judge James L. Cott did not approve the settlement in this order; he provided guidance on settlement terms and directed the parties to request court approval.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Juarez Cristino v. Duke Ellington Gourmet Corp. · No. 1:20-cv-07546
Judge
James Cott
Date
June 30, 2023

Background

The docket showed that the parties participated in mediation on June 28, 2023, and reached a settlement resolving all issues.

Order

The court directed the parties to file a joint letter motion with their settlement agreement by July 31, 2023. The motion must explain why the proposed settlement is fair and reasonable and otherwise complies with the Second Circuit’s requirements for approving settlements in wage-and-hour cases.

The court also referred the parties to several of its prior rulings for guidance about potentially permissible and impermissible settlement provisions, including restrictions on discussing or publicizing the settlement, reemployment provisions, releases, confidentiality, and mutual non-disparagement terms. It identified several other cases as examples of settlement papers the court had recently approved.

Disposition

The order directed the parties to request court approval of their settlement. It did not itself approve the settlement or enter a final judgment.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.