Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 12, 2023

Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. Orchard Technologies, Inc.

Judge
Valerie Caproni
Docket
1:23-cv-05831
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
2
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

Shareholder Representative Services v. Orchard Technologies was dismissed without prejudice for lack of diversity jurisdiction, Judge Caproni ordered.

Who this affects

Shareholder Representative Services LLC and Orchard Technologies, Inc.; the case was dismissed without prejudice because the court found no diversity jurisdiction.

What happened

Shareholder Representative Services LLC sued Orchard Technologies, Inc., relying on diversity jurisdiction, which requires opposing parties to be citizens of different states.

The court required an amended complaint because the original complaint did not identify the citizenship of Shareholder Representative Services LLC’s members. The amended complaint stated that its sole member was an LLC owned wholly by SRS Acquicom Inc., a Delaware corporation, while Orchard Technologies was also identified as a Delaware corporation.

Judge Caproni ruled that both parties were citizens of Delaware, so the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. She dismissed the case without prejudice and directed the Clerk of Court to close it.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. Orchard Technologies, Inc. · No. 1:23-cv-05831
Judge
Valerie Caproni
Date
July 12, 2023

Background

Shareholder Representative Services LLC filed a complaint against Orchard Technologies, Inc. The complaint alleged that federal subject-matter jurisdiction—the court’s legal authority to hear the case—was based on diversity of citizenship.

The court explained that diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity, meaning that all plaintiffs must be citizens of states different from all defendants. For this purpose, a corporation is a citizen of its state of incorporation and principal place of business. A limited liability company is a citizen of every state where its members are citizens. A complaint relying on diversity jurisdiction must therefore identify the citizenship of an LLC’s members and, when applicable, the citizenship of entities further up the ownership chain.

Jurisdictional Deficiency

Because the original complaint did not allege the citizenships of Shareholder Representative Services LLC’s members, the court ordered Plaintiff to amend the complaint. The Amended Complaint stated that Plaintiff’s sole member was an LLC owned wholly by “SRS Acquicom Inc., a Delaware corporation.” It also stated that Orchard Technologies, Inc. was a Delaware corporation.

Ruling

The court ordered that both parties were citizens of Delaware and that Plaintiff therefore had failed to allege diversity of citizenship. The court concluded that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, dismissed the case without prejudice, and directed the Clerk of Court to close the case.

The authoritative version

Read the full 2-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.