Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 13, 2023

Velazquez v. Camille Beckman Corporation

Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Docket
1:22-cv-09169
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Velazquez v. Camille Beckman, Judge Abrams discontinued the settled case without costs and without prejudice to restoration within 60 days.

Who this affects

Bryan Velazquez and Camille Beckman Corporation; the case was closed after the reported settlement, subject to the order’s restoration and settlement-enforcement conditions.

What happened

Bryan Velazquez sued Camille Beckman Corporation, and the court was told that the case had settled.

The court discontinued the case without costs to either party and without prejudice to restoring it if an application was made within 60 days. The clerk was directed to close the case.

Judge Ronnie Abrams also stated that any settlement terms must be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the stated 30-day period if the parties wanted the court to retain power to enforce the settlement.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Velazquez v. Camille Beckman Corporation · No. 1:22-cv-09169
Judge
Ronnie Abrams
Date
July 13, 2023

Background

The opinion states that the court was informed that this case had settled. It does not describe the claims, the settlement terms, or the parties’ positions.

Court’s Action

The court ordered that the action be discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to the court’s docket if an application to restore it was made within 60 days. The court also stated that an application to reopen filed after that period might be denied solely because it was late.

If the parties wanted the court to retain jurisdiction—that is, continuing authority—to enforce a settlement agreement, the court required the agreement’s terms to be placed on the public record and approved by the court within the same 30-day period stated in the order. The clerk was directed to close the case. The order does not decide the merits of the underlying dispute.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.