Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 17, 2023

Falls v. County of Orange

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-04528
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
1
Civil Procedure
In one sentence

In Falls v. County of Orange, Judge Swain dismissed the amended complaint without prejudice because Falls neither submitted required forms nor paid filing fees.

Who this affects

Raiquan K. Falls’s amended complaint was dismissed without prejudice because he did not submit the required fee-waiver and prisoner-authorization forms or pay the filing fees. The court did not decide the merits of his claims against the County of Orange.

What happened

In Falls v. County of Orange, the court had directed Raiquan K. Falls to submit an application to waive the filing fee and a prisoner authorization, or pay the required $402 in fees.

Falls filed an amended complaint but did not submit the required forms or pay the fees. The court had warned that failing to comply would result in dismissal.

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the amended complaint without prejudice. She also denied fee-waiver status for any appeal after certifying that an appeal would not be taken in good faith.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Falls v. County of Orange · No. 1:23-cv-04528
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 17, 2023

Background

The court had previously ordered Raiquan K. Falls to submit a completed application to proceed without paying the filing fee and a prisoner authorization, or to pay the $402 in fees required to file a civil action. The court’s earlier order stated that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint.

Falls filed an amended complaint but did not submit the fee-waiver application and prisoner authorization or pay the filing fees.

Ruling

Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain dismissed the amended complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914 and 1915. The opinion does not address the merits of the claims against the County of Orange.

The court also certified under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied fee-waiver status for purposes of an appeal. Judgment was ordered to be entered.

The authoritative version

Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.