District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of…
District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America v. Triangle Enterprise NYC, Inc.
- Paul Engelmayer
- 1:23-cv-04403
- U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
- 1
In District Council v. Triangle Enterprise, Judge Engelmayer set deadlines for briefing a petition to confirm an arbitration award.
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and Triangle Enterprise NYC, Inc.; the order set the schedule for their filings on the petition to confirm an arbitration award.
What happened
The District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America filed a petition asking the court to confirm an arbitration award against Triangle Enterprise NYC, Inc.
The court explained that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated like a motion for summary judgment. It ordered the petitioners to submit any additional supporting materials by August 1, 2023; set August 15 for Triangle Enterprise’s opposition, if any; and set August 22 for the petitioners’ reply, if any.
Judge Paul A. Engelmayer issued this scheduling order on July 18, 2023. The order did not decide whether to confirm the arbitration award.
The detailed version
- District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of… · No. 1:23-cv-04403
- Paul Engelmayer
- July 19, 2023
Background
The petitioners filed a petition to confirm an arbitration award. The opinion does not describe the underlying dispute or the arbitration award’s terms.
Court’s action
The court stated that proceedings to confirm an arbitration award are treated as similar to a motion for summary judgment. It ordered the petitioners to file and serve any additional materials supporting the petition by August 1, 2023. Triangle Enterprise’s opposition, if any, was due August 15, 2023, and the petitioners’ reply, if any, was due August 22, 2023.
Disposition
The court entered a scheduling order. It did not grant or deny the petition to confirm the arbitration award and did not decide the merits of that petition.
Read the full 1-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.