Court, Explained
U.S. Federal District Courts
←Back to docket
S.D.N.Y.Procedural orderFiled July 20, 2023

Drummond v. CVS Pharmacy

Judge
Laura Swain
Docket
1:23-cv-05992
Court
U.S. District Court · Southern District of New York
Pages
3
Civil ProcedurePro Se
In one sentence

In Drummond v. CVS Pharmacy, Judge Swain transferred the civil-rights case to the Eastern District of New York because Brooklyn was the proper venue.

Who this affects

The transfer affects Stanley Otis Drummond and CVS Pharmacy. The case was moved from the Southern District of New York to the Eastern District of New York; the transferee court will decide whether Drummond may proceed without prepaying fees.

What happened

In Drummond v. CVS Pharmacy, Stanley Otis Drummond, representing himself, alleged that a CVS store manager and security guard violated his civil rights at a Brooklyn pharmacy. He filed the case in the Southern District of New York.

The court ruled that venue was improper there because the defendant pharmacy and the events described in the complaint were in Brooklyn, which is in the Eastern District of New York. The court therefore ordered the case transferred rather than dismissed.

Judge Laura Taylor Swain directed the clerk to transfer the case to the Eastern District of New York and closed the case in the Southern District of New York. The transferee court will decide whether Drummond may proceed without paying filing fees; no summons will issue from the Southern District court.

The detailed version

For law students, journalists, and other readers who want the full reasoning

Case
Drummond v. CVS Pharmacy · No. 1:23-cv-05992
Judge
Laura Swain
Date
July 20, 2023

Background

Stanley Otis Drummond, proceeding without a lawyer, brought this federal civil-rights action against CVS Pharmacy, identified as the CVS location at 218 Myrtle Avenue in Brooklyn, New York. He alleged that a store manager and a security guard violated his civil rights at that location. The opinion states that Drummond resides in Brooklyn and that the events underlying his claims occurred there.

Venue analysis

Venue is the federal district where a civil case may properly be heard. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391, venue generally may be proper where a defendant resides or where a substantial part of the events occurred. The court concluded from the complaint that venue was not proper in the Southern District of New York because the pharmacy was in Brooklyn and the alleged events occurred there. Brooklyn is in the Eastern District of New York.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1406, when a case is filed in the wrong venue, a court may transfer it to a district where it could have been brought if transfer serves the interests of justice. The court found that the Eastern District of New York was the proper venue and that transfer was in the interest of justice.

Disposition

Judge Laura Taylor Swain ordered the clerk to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The Southern District court stated that the transferee court would decide whether Drummond could proceed without prepaying filing fees. It also ordered that no summons issue from the Southern District of New York and stated that the order closed that case. The court certified that an appeal would not be taken in good faith and denied the plaintiff permission to appeal without prepaying fees. The opinion did not decide whether Drummond's civil-rights allegations were legally valid.

The authoritative version

Read the full 3-page opinion on CourtListener, the free public archive maintained by the Free Law Project.

Open opinion PDF →
Summary written with AI assistance. See how summaries are made. Spot something wrong? Tell us.